Questions about JPG lossless rotation:
1. When I do batch JPG lossless auto rotation, IV modifies all files, even those which don't need to be rotated (EXIF orientation flag "top left"), and even if "optimize" and "set DPI" are unchecked, and "keep all markers" is checked. What does IV do to the files that don't need to be rotated, and why?
I like batch lossless auto rotation, but would rather not touch files that don't need to be touched, even if modification is lossless. Is there a way to have IV go through a bunch of JPGs, losslessly auto rotate those that need to be rotated, and skip the ones that don't? If not, is there another program that can do this?
2. IV help says JPG rotation is fully lossless only if image height is multiple of 16 pixels, and the remainder pixels are discarded. Does "height" refer to the longer dimension or something else? My Canon A610 5MP camera produces 2592x1944 JPGs, and the shorter dimension 1944 is not divisible by 16. I tried IV lossless rotation on these, and didn't see anything like 8 pixels being cropped on the shorter side. But I would like to confirm that the rotation is fully lossless despite the shorter dimension not divisible by 16.
Thanks
1. When I do batch JPG lossless auto rotation, IV modifies all files, even those which don't need to be rotated (EXIF orientation flag "top left"), and even if "optimize" and "set DPI" are unchecked, and "keep all markers" is checked. What does IV do to the files that don't need to be rotated, and why?
I like batch lossless auto rotation, but would rather not touch files that don't need to be touched, even if modification is lossless. Is there a way to have IV go through a bunch of JPGs, losslessly auto rotate those that need to be rotated, and skip the ones that don't? If not, is there another program that can do this?
2. IV help says JPG rotation is fully lossless only if image height is multiple of 16 pixels, and the remainder pixels are discarded. Does "height" refer to the longer dimension or something else? My Canon A610 5MP camera produces 2592x1944 JPGs, and the shorter dimension 1944 is not divisible by 16. I tried IV lossless rotation on these, and didn't see anything like 8 pixels being cropped on the shorter side. But I would like to confirm that the rotation is fully lossless despite the shorter dimension not divisible by 16.
Thanks
Comment