Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

JPEG or JPEG 2000

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    JPEG or JPEG 2000

    Been at this for a while and just started thinking about "Photo File Conversion"

    From a RAW file , Jpeg or Jpeg 2000 ?

    Thanks
    Last edited by vidlux; 30.04.2023, 06:52 AM.

    #2
    In my quick test, JP2 gave better results, i.e. smaller disk size and more unique colours. I suggest that you do your own tests with a few different photos, and see which you prefer. JPG is obviously more widely supported, and loads faster. I used a quality setting of 90 in each case, but there is no guarantee that I am comparing like with like.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JPG2000 vs JPG.png
Views:	396
Size:	76.4 KB
ID:	97896
    Before you post ... Edit your profile • IrfanView 4.67 • Windows 10 Home 19045.2486

    Irfan PaintIrfan View HelpIrfanPaint HelpRiot.dllMore SkinsFastStone CaptureUploads

    Comment


      #3
      At high quality the file sizes of advanced formats converge closer. JPEG 2000 is a very slow format, which you might not like while loading high resolution pictures on an older computer.

      Comment

      Working...
      X